INVISIBLE GURU FORUM

Some good questions there, and also some complicated answer called for... let me use an example of the duality of meaning challenges.

When I write about ''I am'' there are two ''I am''s that I could refer to. Never to both at the same time as then are mutually exclusive. Sometimes a teacher, like Nis, will differentiate between the two, but often he doesn't because the one referred to is presumed within the context of the conversation, however such is not always the case.

If I speak of the I am from what might be called the personal perspective, I speak of the personal sense you have of existing, the THOUGHT that you are... and when I speak of I am from the non-personal sense, what you are in Truth, I speak from a completely different perspective or realm. If you here the personal perspective without any idea of the ultimate perspective, quite understandably it will sound like gibberish.

In Truth, nothing is... so try talking about that. It's been a challenge for 5,000 years and never adequately been met. It can't be met because there is nothing to meet. From the personal you, everything can be talked about till the cows come home, but all words will have their origins in the dream of a personal you and therefore are as substantial and meaningful as smoke rings in a hurricane.

There is no ''God'' and as you cannot embrace or encompass God, how can you know anything to speak of about him, her or it?

I am perfectly aware that I seem to be speaking circles and sometimes outright b.s. but what is an appearance (I am not even real) suppose to do when pointing a finger at the infinite. Yes, I am God, and of course, in the normal sense of those words, that is delusional. BUT, you are equally God and appear, to me, to be equally illusion because you don't realize it.

If I have confused you, I  have done my job. If you think you understand, then we have both failed and failed miserably. 

Any more questions???

Love ya, Jed.

P.S. My advice, never give up and never to anything but give up.

next question:
what you have done in S/A is an attempt to collapse all pre-made Meanings created by our ancestors, that those Meanings are baseless. since Meanings are attached to names(nouns), I think by removing names, those meanings would be removed too. names work like containers. they contain meanings. if I know that a tree is beautiful and green and healthy and .... I already presumed that there is a tree over there. if I remove the name "tree" I have nothing in my mind to attach meanings to. first we give names to things then we attach different meanings to those names. do you think by removing names I can do S/A faster?

I didn't get you Jed.
what kind of number is 21.33?
how many days should I work on SA?

Jed today I had a dream "that God is truth, and God is everything including me, then I am truth too knowing this would help me to awaken."

I can not understand that, would you be please help me?

thank you Jed.
yesterday I had a sudden insight that everything in the world is close and near me as if they are here. I'm not sure how to convey that insight. do you have any comment about this experience?

Jed how can I kill you?
throughout my journey I have killed many masters and stepped on their dead body. my bloody sword is still in my hand. I wonder how I can kill you. I mean your teachings are the summit. nothing beyond. you are the toughest one. immortal, unkillable! even there is no more questions. no more mind amusements. your book was a sharp slap in my face.

thank you Jed for that slap.

thank you for your nice response. today I came across this questions:

1) what is the relationship between truth and consciousness? are they the same? one is subcategory of another?
one is true another one is illusion?

2) and please tell me what is the relationship between truth and love? some mystics say Love is God but it appears to be untrue.

3) if you come across another enlightened guy how do you talk? what do you talk about? what is of importance to talk when "importance" itself is illusion?

I needed to hear this simple fact: "Consciousness and awareness arise within the larger context of Truth". Now everything makes sense better, it's strange that I have not heard that before.

Jed now I am struggling with this question:
God is a multi_faceted being with absolute features. Since God wants experience his infinite features, He makes the opposite end of continuum such as illusion. God is truth, at the same time He is omniscient too, he is omni-present and the most powerful too. If I am experiencing God as truth, I am experiencing only one feature of God, maybe that's the largest context but thats one facet anyway. I mean awakening to truth dosn't mean having it all. I am awakened to truth but not awakened to His vast knowldge or unlimited power etc. Awakening could occur to every characters of God. Isn't that so? I dare you to prove me wrong... no wait, I dare you to prove me right... ahhh.. I just dare you. 

Please write me at cambodianashram@gmail.com and we can discuss it.

Thanks in advance.

Love ya, Jed.