Dear RH:
Are you really a rock hopper. I am one, but on two wheels. But on to Ramana....
I agree with what you are interpreting of his work, but you have to be careful on your conclusion because there two ''I''. Actually probably an infinite number, but I have to be a least a little reasonable). The personal ''I'', the one that you generally think of as you is indeed an illusion... 100% illusion. BUT, that larger ''I'' (or you) is the context within which ALL ''I''s appear. Nis referred to them as ''I am'' but he was seldom clear on which of the two ''I am''s he was speaking of.
Contemplate it and let me know your thoughts (if you have any and if they are indeed yours).
Love ya, Jed.