My bad Jed, perhaps a momentary absence of not adhering to the guidelines. Ill do better,
I had another aphony, but this one is more in trying to understand things better, which is more phycological, than actuality, maybe.
So anyway, we learn what things are, from the perceiver/projection. We learn what a tree is, what a this and that is, and pretty soon, we know, we recognise, but what we are learning growing up, is from a projection, data from light/sound/to sensation, etc is taken on board by a body that is known via the projection itself, and via that projection, we see it as just another projection. So the universe might of stopped, and done so long enough for whatever I am, to start seeing its falseness, or untruthfulness - hence truth, but this is more in line with understanding things better. IN short, if all is a projection, and we've learnt, hence able to recognise the projected, from the projection itself, well if that isn't fluffy dream stuff, stuff that the scientists take as SO DAM real, well there is no so called, SO dam real period, in the context of projections. As how would we know. Even Einstein concluded that the world might be an illusion, but a persistent one at that. Perception itself seems real, but what is seen, well if its learnt via the projection itself, responded by a projection itself, the universe flashing its falseness to a projection itself, well how much does it take for the lot to be smiled at. Hmm