Why do they call them senses anyway? They point to nonsense.
Everything is everything, all inclusive, beyond definition. Try to contemplate it? Is that a joke? Isn't that what we're trying to stop pretending we can do?
Nothing doesn't exist. It's a mental construct based on nothing. I can contemplate nothing as an idea, but I don't have a "sense" for nothing other than my creative attempts at nonsense. I can't actually "think about" nothing. What would I think about beyond the conclusion that "nothing", isn't? If the intention is just to soften focus on perception of mental and biological constructs then everything comes into focus as the reality of being.
What is it that seems to experience the infinite ever expansive endlessly creative nature of itself? And what, if not itself, is it experiencing? What is infinite but that which cannot be contained and is beyond definition? Can what is beyond definition be experienced? Can it be known, understood, or recognized? If it seems to be any of these things, is it really? It is not contained or retained and yet it seems to be experienced in part by maintianing awareness of an imagined limit, thereby imposing an experience of contrast. What am I experiencing then? The nothing I've made rubbing up against the everything that is. Fantastic! LOL