Author Topic: Jed Rant: More about ''Love ya''.  (Read 1511 times)

Bert

  • Guest
Re: Jed Rant: More about ''Love ya''.
« Reply #15 on: May 12, 2017, 03:24:12 am »
Damn people, to think about having to deal with myself in front of an biased audience.

I like performing crap like that too, but only when the time is right. Of course sometimes I fake it and ruins the fun.

Jed McKenna

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10577
    • View Profile
Re: Jed Rant: More about ''Love ya''.
« Reply #16 on: May 12, 2017, 04:32:09 am »
I don't have a clue...  ??? ??? ???

Love ya, Jed.

macu

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
    • View Profile
Re: Jed Rant: More about ''Love ya''.
« Reply #17 on: May 12, 2017, 07:01:24 am »
Thank you, Jed

FractalJackal

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 37
    • View Profile
Re: Jed Rant: More about ''Love ya''.
« Reply #18 on: May 12, 2017, 10:24:07 am »
Any advice for where direct, asking-for-help consent gets wobbly? How do you determine when to put a stop to something, when the other person might need to experience it?

I suppose the Maxed Question is... How do you kill something and love it at the same time?

Sent from my HTC6525LVW using Tapatalk


Misha

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 220
    • View Profile
Re: Jed Rant: More about ''Love ya''.
« Reply #19 on: May 12, 2017, 11:07:50 am »
Ahhhh...Love is actually the Room Without Requirement.  (Harhar)

Thank you, Jed.  I see once again how you are a Doctor...sometimes mediating among the illusions, sometimes
Kavorkianesque.

I have watched my patience growing, all by itself (what else is there to do, after all?), but for now I do not have as much of it as a Doctor would need (though I do seem to have plenty of the ruthlessness a surgeon needs...grin). Sometimes it seems the best I can pull off is not to trip more wires while trying to extricate from the projections already fired onto me.  Never realized till now that Grace actually means:  Too slippery for the projections to stick while continuing to engage with them....

The desire to cut-and-run is decaying as the realization deepens that there's nowhere to run to, anyway....  interesting to me that it looks/sounds to others like emotional avoidance or lack of emotional depth...and it's bewildering as heck when a day or an hour later or before the same person/S projects onto me all measure of emotional depth, spiritual/emotional/intellectual profundity, etc..  That all brings up a "blech" and "eeek!" response in me, still sometimes.

But engaging-with in the sense you illustrate is something I can do, and I see it likely will get easier fast.  The "blech" and "eek" factor I don't mind leaving to its own fate.  Thanks for the illustrations...when you share them, they are helpful.  :)  Ever thought of another forum, or section of this forum, for just that?  For Post-apocalyptic post-human-engagement engagement coaching/illustrations...?  ...Ahhh, never mind.  It would be pulled over to content like this forum is for, pretty quickly, I see that.  And  It's all good.  :)
--Misha

Jed McKenna

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10577
    • View Profile
Re: Jed Rant: More about ''Love ya''.
« Reply #20 on: May 12, 2017, 09:30:06 pm »
Regarding the opportunity to ''fix'' or ''help'' someone... when in doubt.... keep your mouth shut!  ;) ;) ;)

and... it's a good idea to be in doubt almost always.

Love ya, Jed.

Frits

  • Guest
Re: Jed Rant: More about ''Love ya''.
« Reply #21 on: May 13, 2017, 04:38:16 am »
Sorry... can't help.  :P


Marina

  • Guest
Re: Jed Rant: More about ''Love ya''.
« Reply #22 on: May 13, 2017, 06:04:50 am »
Continuing the theme.

Dear enlightened, I want to ask you:
Do you continue to experience the joy of a drink of good coffee or fine wine?
And if so, what do you feel when you touch someone you love immensely, and who is enlightened as you are?
Of course, I donít mean the relationship between persons.
Of course, I heard that the enlightened Masters weren't in a relationship. On the contrary, they left the relationship before enlightenment.

And what about the relationship between enlightened Masters ?
I think that the word "relationship" isn't accurate.
It must be some other more profound word.

I heard that out of 220 000 ways of perception a human uses only 5-6, through known senses.
(The number 220 000 doesn't fit into my mind, although I was a programmer many years ago.  ::) :D )

Can it become available after enlightenment?
How about this?

Frits

  • Guest
Re: Jed Rant: More about ''Love ya''.
« Reply #23 on: May 13, 2017, 06:28:14 am »
I don't believe there are such creatures as "Enlightened Masters" nor such a thing as enlightenment... and as long as anyone seemingly walks this earth, all are in relation with everything always all the time, we only think/believe we are not.
Like Like x 1 View List

Jed McKenna

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10577
    • View Profile
Re: Jed Rant: More about ''Love ya''.
« Reply #24 on: May 13, 2017, 06:44:04 am »
Hi Marina:

What might you learn about yourself from your questions?  ??? ??? ??? Deep down there is something there for you.  :o :o :o I have a pretty good idea what it is but that doesn't matter.  :P :P :P You tell me.

Love ya, Jed.

P.S. ''I don't know'' will be promptly rejected because if there is one thing I know, it's that you know... sooo much more than you realize.  ::) ::) ::)

bear

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 37
    • View Profile
Re: Jed Rant: More about ''Love ya''.
« Reply #25 on: May 13, 2017, 06:51:22 am »
I have tried it for long. And it's nice.
But life is not much of a story without a story?

I had a weird moment the other day. I became very angry because of a story with another being. I was very upset, throwing things around and ****. And I really went with it, and then I remembered my cookies I had bought earlier and left in the other room and I walked back to get them, and said "I WANT MY DAMN COOKIES" or something... I immediately saw my anger as phony and it vanished... atleast for a while... till I started thinking about the story again. It was a very very big shift. Which left me puzzled.

Marina

  • Guest
Re: Jed Rant: More about ''Love ya''.
« Reply #26 on: May 13, 2017, 08:35:17 am »
Of course my questions speak for themselves. I had some experience with going beyond the limits of ordinary sense organs.
I'm writing here to clarify.
There is some deep query. And I searched for a long time. (Apparently I like long trips.  ;) )
But the answers I found didn't satisfy me.
I often wishful thinking and don't want to repeat the mistake.
So I will voice it when I cleanse of all that is superfluous and will see its essence clearly enough.
« Last Edit: May 14, 2017, 01:24:26 am by Marina »

Jed McKenna

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10577
    • View Profile
Re: Jed Rant: More about ''Love ya''.
« Reply #27 on: May 14, 2017, 01:32:03 am »
The answers didn't satisfy you because you were running a story of what the answers should be. Asking a question and anticipating a specific answer is not a question at all. It is just seeking a confirmation of a story.. not a true inquiry.


Love ya, Jed.
Like Like x 1 View List

Forum member

  • Guest
Re: Jed Rant: More about ''Love ya''.
« Reply #28 on: May 14, 2017, 02:10:18 pm »
The answers didn't satisfy you because you were running a story of what the answers should be. Asking a question and anticipating a specific answer is not a question at all. It is just seeking a confirmation of a story.. not a true inquiry.


Love ya, Jed.

Nice one.. So.. i shouldn't  be asking any questions in the reply im typing right now????? Thats what i did.. o darn you you big ass inflated ego of mine, you should be punished right away!! 😂
« Last Edit: May 14, 2017, 02:13:14 pm by Forum member »

Jed McKenna

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10577
    • View Profile
Re: Jed Rant: More about ''Love ya''.
« Reply #29 on: May 14, 2017, 10:36:55 pm »
Don't be hard on yourself... that's my job..  :P ::) 8)

Love ya, Jed.