Thank you for the comments that are a good inspiration for the different Jed-perspective.
When I was first confronted with the statement that time does not really exist I knew without thinking that this is true and that time is only an idea. Ok, it was not me who knew! How can that be if another statement is true: Nothing but true nature exists? Leibniz already stated that around 1680, which is exactly now. It all happens at the same time? How can that be? Because nothing really happens. Is this starting to sound like blabla?
Better get back to the humorous part: There is definitely a "what's next"-gene in human beings doing an excellent job to avoid "What's now!" but also to keep the excitement for the play alive.
But there may come a change when the human character program gets tired of this way of excitement, experiencing a painful detachment of attachments, and it is wondering like Bob Marley did: "You think you're in heaven but you're livin' in hell" (
no, I don't want to spoil the soup here, this may be the most precious thing going on in the dream).
But (
a lot of buts...) when does this change come if not now? What can ever change in past or future?
I like the comparison with a DVD or a book, where it's all produced or written by now, all stories are already made-up, there is nothing that will be created. But this does not mean it's getting bored like it's not getting bored to read a book although I know for sure what-comes-next cannot be changed.
Oh, I don't want to talk shop, what do I know?, just some thoughts. And yes, these days in the NOW I don't want to do anything else anymore than just embrace it all... it's all just a thought, and I am glad, damn glad and grateful about this fact. But (
one last but) by the way: Who is this damned I if not a thought to embrace?
Thank you deeply!